Article Version of Record

When does the story matter? No evidence for the foregrounding hypothesis in math story problems

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Di Lonardo Burr, Sabrina M.
Turner, Jill
Nietmann, Jesse
LeFevre, Jo-Anne

Abstract / Description

Math story problems are difficult for many solvers because comprehension of mathematical and linguistic content must occur simultaneously. Across two studies, we attempted to conceptually replicate and extend findings reported by Mattarella-Micke and Beilock (2010, https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.106) and Jarosz and Jaeger (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3471). Mattarella-Micke and Beilock found that multiplication word problems in which an irrelevant number was associated with the protagonist of the problem (i.e., foregrounded in the text) were solved less accurately than problems in other conditions. Jarosz and Jaeger used similar materials but tested the more general inconsistent-operations hypothesis that association with the protagonist would interfere with multiplication whereas dissociation would interfere with division. They found partial support: When division problems were primed with dissociative scenarios, solvers made more errors, but they failed to replicate the associative findings for multiplication. In the present research, we conducted two studies (Ns = 205 and 359), in which we similarly manipulated whether irrelevant content was associated with or dissociated from the story protagonist. In these studies, we did not find support for either the foregrounding or inconsistent-operations hypotheses. Exploratory error analyses suggested that solvers’ errors were most often the result of calculation difficulties or inappropriate operation choices and were unrelated to the presence of associative or dissociative story elements. Our careful implementation of this manipulation and much greater power to detect effects suggests that the association manipulation in irrelevant text does not influence adults’ performance on simple math story problems.

Keyword(s)

word problems math performance numerical interference extraneous elements

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2021-11-30

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

7

Issue

3

Page numbers

259–274

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Di Lonardo Burr, S. M., Turner, J., Nietmann, J., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2021). When does the story matter? No evidence for the foregrounding hypothesis in math story problems. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 7(3), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6053
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Di Lonardo Burr, Sabrina M.
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Turner, Jill
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Nietmann, Jesse
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    LeFevre, Jo-Anne
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:22:03Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:22:03Z
  • Date of first publication
    2021-11-30
  • Abstract / Description
    Math story problems are difficult for many solvers because comprehension of mathematical and linguistic content must occur simultaneously. Across two studies, we attempted to conceptually replicate and extend findings reported by Mattarella-Micke and Beilock (2010, https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.106) and Jarosz and Jaeger (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3471). Mattarella-Micke and Beilock found that multiplication word problems in which an irrelevant number was associated with the protagonist of the problem (i.e., foregrounded in the text) were solved less accurately than problems in other conditions. Jarosz and Jaeger used similar materials but tested the more general inconsistent-operations hypothesis that association with the protagonist would interfere with multiplication whereas dissociation would interfere with division. They found partial support: When division problems were primed with dissociative scenarios, solvers made more errors, but they failed to replicate the associative findings for multiplication. In the present research, we conducted two studies (Ns = 205 and 359), in which we similarly manipulated whether irrelevant content was associated with or dissociated from the story protagonist. In these studies, we did not find support for either the foregrounding or inconsistent-operations hypotheses. Exploratory error analyses suggested that solvers’ errors were most often the result of calculation difficulties or inappropriate operation choices and were unrelated to the presence of associative or dissociative story elements. Our careful implementation of this manipulation and much greater power to detect effects suggests that the association manipulation in irrelevant text does not influence adults’ performance on simple math story problems.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Di Lonardo Burr, S. M., Turner, J., Nietmann, J., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2021). When does the story matter? No evidence for the foregrounding hypothesis in math story problems. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 7(3), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6053
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5501
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6105
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6053
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4765
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5220
  • Is related to
    https://osf.io/8kvef/
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4765
  • Keyword(s)
    word problems
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    math performance
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    numerical interference
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    extraneous elements
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    When does the story matter? No evidence for the foregrounding hypothesis in math story problems
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    259–274
  • Volume
    7
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US