Between Bandura and Giddens: Structuration Theory in Social Psychological Research?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Oppong, Seth
Abstract / Description
In any social analysis, one can attribute observed behavioural outcomes to actions and inactions of people (agents) or to the presence or absence of certain structures or systems. The dualism of agent and structure is resolved through the concept of duality as proposed by Anthony Giddens in his structuration theory (ST). Though ST has been applied in other disciplines, it is either less known or applied in psychology. This paper sought to examine ST as a framework for understanding the interdependent relationship between structure and agents in the light of offering explanatory framework in social science research or policy formulation. It concluded with an integrated model comprising elements of both Bandura’s social-cognitive theory and Giddens’ ST.
Keyword(s)
duality of agent and structure structuration social-cognitive theoryPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2014-10-22
Journal title
Psychological Thought
Volume
7
Issue
2
Page numbers
111–123
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Oppong, S. (2014). Between Bandura and Giddens: Structuration Theory in Social Psychological Research? Psychological Thought, 7(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.104
-
psyct.v7i2.104.pdfAdobe PDF - 642.49KBMD5: 8c68e2d45510cfb116482ac94e63a8ab
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Oppong, Seth
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-28T10:02:00Z
-
Made available on2018-11-28T10:02:00Z
-
Date of first publication2014-10-22
-
Abstract / DescriptionIn any social analysis, one can attribute observed behavioural outcomes to actions and inactions of people (agents) or to the presence or absence of certain structures or systems. The dualism of agent and structure is resolved through the concept of duality as proposed by Anthony Giddens in his structuration theory (ST). Though ST has been applied in other disciplines, it is either less known or applied in psychology. This paper sought to examine ST as a framework for understanding the interdependent relationship between structure and agents in the light of offering explanatory framework in social science research or policy formulation. It concluded with an integrated model comprising elements of both Bandura’s social-cognitive theory and Giddens’ ST.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationOppong, S. (2014). Between Bandura and Giddens: Structuration Theory in Social Psychological Research? Psychological Thought, 7(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.104en_US
-
ISSN2193-7281
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1583
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1949
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v7i2.104
-
Keyword(s)duality of agent and structureen_US
-
Keyword(s)structurationen_US
-
Keyword(s)social-cognitive theoryen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleBetween Bandura and Giddens: Structuration Theory in Social Psychological Research?en_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue2
-
Journal titlePsychological Thought
-
Page numbers111–123
-
Volume7
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record