Code

Analysis scripts for: Evidence-Based Adaptivity Decisions for Educational Interventions

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Breitwieser, Jasmin
Schaaf, Mirijam
Brod, Garvin

Abstract / Description

Digital technologies enable adaptive support based on students’ behavior. However, determining optimal support for each student is methodologically challenging: If adaptations depend on prior behavior, adaptivity decisions are not fully randomized, which complicates causal inference. We present a methodological approach based on sequential experimental designs and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to evaluate adaptivity decisions. We illustrate this approach in a mobile intervention promoting frequent vocabulary study. Students received planning prompts during a 20-day first-stage intervention, followed by an adapted prompting frequency in the second stage. Using a DAG, we formalized causal assumptions, identified confounding, and adjusted for it. The results illustrate the importance of this methodological approach to obtain valid causal conclusions: an unadjusted analysis would have led to the incorrect conclusion that scheduling more prompts leads to reduced study activity. Instead, we found that the effect of prompting frequency differed between students, highlighting the value of adapting support.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2026-11-11

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Breitwieser, Jasmin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schaaf, Mirijam
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Brod, Garvin
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2026-11-11T07:40:23Z
  • Made available on
    2026-11-11T07:40:23Z
  • Date of first publication
    2026-11-11
  • Abstract / Description
    Digital technologies enable adaptive support based on students’ behavior. However, determining optimal support for each student is methodologically challenging: If adaptations depend on prior behavior, adaptivity decisions are not fully randomized, which complicates causal inference. We present a methodological approach based on sequential experimental designs and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to evaluate adaptivity decisions. We illustrate this approach in a mobile intervention promoting frequent vocabulary study. Students received planning prompts during a 20-day first-stage intervention, followed by an adapted prompting frequency in the second stage. Using a DAG, we formalized causal assumptions, identified confounding, and adjusted for it. The results illustrate the importance of this methodological approach to obtain valid causal conclusions: an unadjusted analysis would have led to the incorrect conclusion that scheduling more prompts leads to reduced study activity. Instead, we found that the effect of prompting frequency differed between students, highlighting the value of adapting support.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/18084
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22752
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/18083
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/18086
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/18085
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Analysis scripts for: Evidence-Based Adaptivity Decisions for Educational Interventions
    en
  • DRO type
    code