Article Version of Record

Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Hurst, Michelle Ann
Massaro, Marisa
Cordes, Sara

Abstract / Description

Fraction notation conveys both part-whole (3/4 is 3 out of 4) and magnitude (3/4 = 0.75) information, yet evidence suggests that both children and adults find accessing magnitude information from fractions particularly difficult. Recent research suggests that using number lines to teach children about fractions can help emphasize fraction magnitude. In three experiments with adults and 9-12-year-old children, we compare the benefits of number lines and pie charts for thinking about rational numbers. In Experiment 1, we first investigate how adults spontaneously visualize symbolic fractions. Then, in two further experiments, we explore whether priming children to use pie charts vs. number lines impacts performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude task and whether children differentially rely on a partitioning strategy to map rational numbers to number lines vs. pie charts. Our data reveal that adults very infrequently spontaneously visualize fractions along a number line and, contrary to other findings, that practice mapping rational numbers to number lines did not improve performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude comparison task relative to practice mapping the same magnitudes to pie charts. However, children were more likely to use overt partitioning strategies when working with pie charts compared to number lines, suggesting these representations did lend themselves to different working strategies. We discuss the interpretations and implications of these findings for future research and education. All materials and data are provided as Supplementary Materials.

Keyword(s)

fractions number lines pie charts decimals area models magnitude rational numbers

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2020-09-09

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

6

Issue

2

Page numbers

204–230

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Hurst, M. A., Massaro, M., & Cordes, S. (2020). Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hurst, Michelle Ann
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Massaro, Marisa
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Cordes, Sara
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-04-14T11:21:49Z
  • Made available on
    2022-04-14T11:21:49Z
  • Date of first publication
    2020-09-09
  • Abstract / Description
    Fraction notation conveys both part-whole (3/4 is 3 out of 4) and magnitude (3/4 = 0.75) information, yet evidence suggests that both children and adults find accessing magnitude information from fractions particularly difficult. Recent research suggests that using number lines to teach children about fractions can help emphasize fraction magnitude. In three experiments with adults and 9-12-year-old children, we compare the benefits of number lines and pie charts for thinking about rational numbers. In Experiment 1, we first investigate how adults spontaneously visualize symbolic fractions. Then, in two further experiments, we explore whether priming children to use pie charts vs. number lines impacts performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude task and whether children differentially rely on a partitioning strategy to map rational numbers to number lines vs. pie charts. Our data reveal that adults very infrequently spontaneously visualize fractions along a number line and, contrary to other findings, that practice mapping rational numbers to number lines did not improve performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude comparison task relative to practice mapping the same magnitudes to pie charts. However, children were more likely to use overt partitioning strategies when working with pie charts compared to number lines, suggesting these representations did lend themselves to different working strategies. We discuss the interpretations and implications of these findings for future research and education. All materials and data are provided as Supplementary Materials.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Hurst, M. A., Massaro, M., & Cordes, S. (2020). Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5479
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6083
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285
  • Is related to
    https://osf.io/eycdk
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3164
  • Keyword(s)
    fractions
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    number lines
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    pie charts
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    decimals
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    area models
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    magnitude
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    rational numbers
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    204–230
  • Volume
    6
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US