Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Hurst, Michelle Ann
Massaro, Marisa
Cordes, Sara
Abstract / Description
Fraction notation conveys both part-whole (3/4 is 3 out of 4) and magnitude (3/4 = 0.75) information, yet evidence suggests that both children and adults find accessing magnitude information from fractions particularly difficult. Recent research suggests that using number lines to teach children about fractions can help emphasize fraction magnitude. In three experiments with adults and 9-12-year-old children, we compare the benefits of number lines and pie charts for thinking about rational numbers. In Experiment 1, we first investigate how adults spontaneously visualize symbolic fractions. Then, in two further experiments, we explore whether priming children to use pie charts vs. number lines impacts performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude task and whether children differentially rely on a partitioning strategy to map rational numbers to number lines vs. pie charts. Our data reveal that adults very infrequently spontaneously visualize fractions along a number line and, contrary to other findings, that practice mapping rational numbers to number lines did not improve performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude comparison task relative to practice mapping the same magnitudes to pie charts. However, children were more likely to use overt partitioning strategies when working with pie charts compared to number lines, suggesting these representations did lend themselves to different working strategies. We discuss the interpretations and implications of these findings for future research and education. All materials and data are provided as Supplementary Materials.
Keyword(s)
fractions number lines pie charts decimals area models magnitude rational numbersPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2020-09-09
Journal title
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Volume
6
Issue
2
Page numbers
204–230
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Hurst, M. A., Massaro, M., & Cordes, S. (2020). Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285
-
jnc.v6i1.285.pdfAdobe PDF - 717.39KBMD5: 648aee8ef48702d9e29cc5af5be15507
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Hurst, Michelle Ann
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Massaro, Marisa
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Cordes, Sara
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-04-14T11:21:49Z
-
Made available on2022-04-14T11:21:49Z
-
Date of first publication2020-09-09
-
Abstract / DescriptionFraction notation conveys both part-whole (3/4 is 3 out of 4) and magnitude (3/4 = 0.75) information, yet evidence suggests that both children and adults find accessing magnitude information from fractions particularly difficult. Recent research suggests that using number lines to teach children about fractions can help emphasize fraction magnitude. In three experiments with adults and 9-12-year-old children, we compare the benefits of number lines and pie charts for thinking about rational numbers. In Experiment 1, we first investigate how adults spontaneously visualize symbolic fractions. Then, in two further experiments, we explore whether priming children to use pie charts vs. number lines impacts performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude task and whether children differentially rely on a partitioning strategy to map rational numbers to number lines vs. pie charts. Our data reveal that adults very infrequently spontaneously visualize fractions along a number line and, contrary to other findings, that practice mapping rational numbers to number lines did not improve performance on a subsequent symbolic magnitude comparison task relative to practice mapping the same magnitudes to pie charts. However, children were more likely to use overt partitioning strategies when working with pie charts compared to number lines, suggesting these representations did lend themselves to different working strategies. We discuss the interpretations and implications of these findings for future research and education. All materials and data are provided as Supplementary Materials.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationHurst, M. A., Massaro, M., & Cordes, S. (2020). Fraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportion. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285en_US
-
ISSN2363-8761
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/5479
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6083
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.285
-
Is related tohttps://osf.io/eycdk
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3164
-
Keyword(s)fractionsen_US
-
Keyword(s)number linesen_US
-
Keyword(s)pie chartsen_US
-
Keyword(s)decimalsen_US
-
Keyword(s)area modelsen_US
-
Keyword(s)magnitudeen_US
-
Keyword(s)rational numbersen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleFraction magnitude: Mapping between symbolic and spatial representations of proportionen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue2
-
Journal titleJournal of Numerical Cognition
-
Page numbers204–230
-
Volume6
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Recorden_US