Code

Code for: Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility: Criteria for Documenting Research Synthesis Processes and Data

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Petrule, Claudiu
Heck, Tamara
Burgard, Tanja
Jung, Nadeshda

Abstract / Description

This study addresses the adaptation of research synthesis standards in social, educational, and psychological sciences. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive documentation and adherence to reporting guidelines and FAIR principles to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Existing guidelines like PRISMA and FAIR guide documentation but lack specifics on making methodological data accessible. The study aims to develop a set of criteria to document review processes and data, enhancing reproducibility in psychology and education. Using a sample of 100 systematic reviews within these disciplines, it evaluates the adherence to these criteria. The results will reveal the extent of documentation rigor, identify missing elements, and inform recommendations for improving research synthesis documentation. The study's findings will contribute to standardizing synthesis documentation, promoting transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.

Keyword(s)

Reproducibility Research Synthesis Reporting guidelines Education Psychology

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2025-04-23

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Petrule, Claudiu
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Heck, Tamara
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Burgard, Tanja
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Jung, Nadeshda
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2025-04-23T15:09:38Z
  • Made available on
    2025-04-23T15:09:38Z
  • Date of first publication
    2025-04-23
  • Abstract / Description
    This study addresses the adaptation of research synthesis standards in social, educational, and psychological sciences. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive documentation and adherence to reporting guidelines and FAIR principles to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Existing guidelines like PRISMA and FAIR guide documentation but lack specifics on making methodological data accessible. The study aims to develop a set of criteria to document review processes and data, enhancing reproducibility in psychology and education. Using a sample of 100 systematic reviews within these disciplines, it evaluates the adherence to these criteria. The results will reveal the extent of documentation rigor, identify missing elements, and inform recommendations for improving research synthesis documentation. The study's findings will contribute to standardizing synthesis documentation, promoting transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11640
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16228
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/11642
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/11641
  • Keyword(s)
    Reproducibility
  • Keyword(s)
    Research Synthesis
  • Keyword(s)
    Reporting guidelines
  • Keyword(s)
    Education
  • Keyword(s)
    Psychology
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Code for: Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility: Criteria for Documenting Research Synthesis Processes and Data
    en
  • DRO type
    code
  • Leibniz institute name(s) / abbreviation(s)
    ZPID