Measuring cultural capital using book collections. What are we missing by not asking about digital objects?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Balzer, Dave
Sawert, Tim
Schlosser, Marie
Röser, Annalena
Otte, Gunnar
Abstract / Description
Even though Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital is often criticized as poorly defined and vague, it remains a central and widely used concept in research on the reproduction of social inequality. In this regard, objectified cultural capital is most often captured by the prominent indicator of the number of books in the household. In times of advancing digitization, the question arises to what extent this indicator does neglect a crucial part of book collections—namely e-books. Using German survey data on cultural participation from 2018, we therefore assess whether a combined indicator of physical and digital book collections is more valid than the traditional indicator of number of printed books in the household. Our empirical findings indicate that, at the time of the survey, the information gains are marginal if digital collections are additionally considered.
Keyword(s)
cultural capital book collections digitization digitalization e-books BourdieuPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2025-03-26
Journal title
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Volume
7
Article number
Article e13523
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Balzer, D., Sawert, T., Schlosser, M., Röser, A., & Otte, G. (2025). Measuring cultural capital using book collections. What are we missing by not asking about digital objects?. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 7, Article e13523. https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.13523
-
miss.v7.13523.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.71MBMD5: d2fe542a7d4005aeccd648f6ee97a4be
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Balzer, Dave
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Sawert, Tim
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Schlosser, Marie
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Röser, Annalena
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Otte, Gunnar
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2025-04-25T11:32:59Z
-
Made available on2025-04-25T11:32:59Z
-
Date of first publication2025-03-26
-
Abstract / DescriptionEven though Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital is often criticized as poorly defined and vague, it remains a central and widely used concept in research on the reproduction of social inequality. In this regard, objectified cultural capital is most often captured by the prominent indicator of the number of books in the household. In times of advancing digitization, the question arises to what extent this indicator does neglect a crucial part of book collections—namely e-books. Using German survey data on cultural participation from 2018, we therefore assess whether a combined indicator of physical and digital book collections is more valid than the traditional indicator of number of printed books in the household. Our empirical findings indicate that, at the time of the survey, the information gains are marginal if digital collections are additionally considered.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationBalzer, D., Sawert, T., Schlosser, M., Röser, A., & Otte, G. (2025). Measuring cultural capital using book collections. What are we missing by not asking about digital objects?. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 7, Article e13523. https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.13523
-
ISSN2523-8930
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11703
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16291
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/miss.13523
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16184
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.4232/1.14289
-
Is related tohttps://osf.io/pjrzf/
-
Keyword(s)cultural capitalen_US
-
Keyword(s)book collectionsen_US
-
Keyword(s)digitizationen_US
-
Keyword(s)digitalizationen_US
-
Keyword(s)e-booksen_US
-
Keyword(s)Bourdieuen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleMeasuring cultural capital using book collections. What are we missing by not asking about digital objects?en_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Article numberArticle e13523
-
Journal titleMeasurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
-
Volume7
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record