Effects of Daily Affective Experiences on Boundary Management Preferences – A Daily Diary Study
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Mueller, Nicolas
Loeffelsend, Sophia
Kempen, Regina
Abstract / Description
Boundary management theory addresses whether people prefer to separate or integrate their work and nonwork roles. While the outcomes of boundary management are well understood, there is little to no answer to what motivates people to prefer segmentation or integration. Drawing on affective events and broaden-and-build theory, we examine the influence of daily affective experiences (i.e., affective events and mood) at work and in nonwork life on boundary management preferences. We hypothesize that negative (positive) affective experiences lead to a segmentation (integration) preference. Moreover, we consider work and nonwork role involvement as moderators and differentiate between work-to-nonwork and nonwork-to-work segmentation preferences. We target a net sample of N = 300 employees working full-time. We deploy a daily diary study over one workweek with two measurement points a day. Participants will rate affective events, mood, and boundary management preferences each day during the morning at work and during the evening at home.
Keyword(s)
boundary management segmentation preference affective events mood role involvement daily diary studyPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2022-02-15 08:14:30 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
Mueller_et_al_2022_Preregistration_Affect_Diary_Study.pdfAdobe PDF - 427.68KBMD5: 5ed1109a5743e349d9ee564b04cf5bbeDescription: Preregistration (PRP-QUANT)
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Mueller, Nicolas
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Loeffelsend, Sophia
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kempen, Regina
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-02-15T08:14:30Z
-
Made available on2022-02-15T08:14:30Z
-
Date of first publication2022-02-15
-
Abstract / DescriptionBoundary management theory addresses whether people prefer to separate or integrate their work and nonwork roles. While the outcomes of boundary management are well understood, there is little to no answer to what motivates people to prefer segmentation or integration. Drawing on affective events and broaden-and-build theory, we examine the influence of daily affective experiences (i.e., affective events and mood) at work and in nonwork life on boundary management preferences. We hypothesize that negative (positive) affective experiences lead to a segmentation (integration) preference. Moreover, we consider work and nonwork role involvement as moderators and differentiate between work-to-nonwork and nonwork-to-work segmentation preferences. We target a net sample of N = 300 employees working full-time. We deploy a daily diary study over one workweek with two measurement points a day. Participants will rate affective events, mood, and boundary management preferences each day during the morning at work and during the evening at home.en
-
Publication statusotheren
-
Review statuspeerRevieweden
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4804
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5398
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8138
-
Keyword(s)boundary managementen
-
Keyword(s)segmentation preferenceen
-
Keyword(s)affective eventsen
-
Keyword(s)mooden
-
Keyword(s)role involvementen
-
Keyword(s)daily diary studyen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleEffects of Daily Affective Experiences on Boundary Management Preferences – A Daily Diary Studyen
-
DRO typepreregistrationen
-
Visible tag(s)PRP-QUANTen
-
Visible tag(s)PsychLaben