On Choosing a Model for Measuring
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Wilson, Mark
Abstract / Description
This paper describes an approach to the issue of selecting a measurement model that is based on a comprehensive framework for measurement consisting of four conceptual building blocks: The construct map, the items design, the outcome space, and the measurement model. Starting from this framework of building blocks, the measurement model selected must conform to the constraints imposed by the other three components. Specifically, to preserve the interpretability of the construct map, the models must preserve the order of items throughout the range of person locations, and must do so in a way that is consistent with the interpretational requirements of the map. In the case of item response modeling, this translates into selecting models that have a constant slope—i.e., they must be from the Rasch family. In the conclusion, some next steps in investigating these issues are discussed.
Keyword(s)
item response theory construct validity Rasch modelPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2003
Journal title
Methods of Psychological Research
Volume
8
Issue
3
Page numbers
1-22
Publisher
Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
unknown
Citation
-
MPR-Online_2003_8.3_Wilson.pdfAdobe PDF - 179.58KBMD5: 33c125d1590d8143dbe932ec1c3bc29a
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Wilson, Mark
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2023-04-25T14:26:09Z
-
Made available on2023-04-25T14:26:09Z
-
Date of first publication2003
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis paper describes an approach to the issue of selecting a measurement model that is based on a comprehensive framework for measurement consisting of four conceptual building blocks: The construct map, the items design, the outcome space, and the measurement model. Starting from this framework of building blocks, the measurement model selected must conform to the constraints imposed by the other three components. Specifically, to preserve the interpretability of the construct map, the models must preserve the order of items throughout the range of person locations, and must do so in a way that is consistent with the interpretational requirements of the map. In the case of item response modeling, this translates into selecting models that have a constant slope—i.e., they must be from the Rasch family. In the conclusion, some next steps in investigating these issues are discussed.en
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statusunknown
-
ISSN1432-8534
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8312
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12789
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherDepartment of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
-
Keyword(s)item response theoryen_US
-
Keyword(s)construct validityen_US
-
Keyword(s)Rasch modelen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleOn Choosing a Model for Measuringen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue3
-
Journal titleMethods of Psychological Research
-
Page numbers1-22
-
Volume8
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record