This is not the latest version of this Digital Research Object (DRO). The latest version can be found here!
Test for: Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Brugman, Daniel
Abstract / Description
The Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO) aims to assess the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. A new index for measuring moral reasoning is introduced. The first study assessed construct validity by examining the structure and invariance of moral reasoning and moral value evaluation in community adolescents and adults from The Netherlands (N = 1,583). Factor analyses supported the unidimensionality of both components. Measurement invariance was found across age groups, gender, and educational levels. Convergent validity was supported by positive relationships between moral reasoning and age in males and between moral reasoning and higher educational levels. Divergent validity was supported by the weak relationship of both components with social desirability and their negative relationship with self-centered orientation and self-reported antisocial/delinquent behavior. The second study included incarcerated juvenile delinquents (N = 246). Measurement invariance was found for both components across delinquency groups. Furthermore, community participants reporting no antisocial/delinquent behavior showed higher levels on both components than community participants reporting antisocial/delinquent behavior and juvenile delinquents. The SRM-SFO provides acceptable to good psychometric properties for assessing the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. Its practical benefits support its use in large-scale research from young adolescence onward.The SRM-SFO consists of 10 sets of questions. Each set introduces a value, often in an everyday context (Appendix). The values are organized in four areas: Contract & Truth (item set 1-4), Affiliation (5), Life (6-7), Property, Law, and Legal Justice (8-10). Following the introductory stem is a question regarding the evaluation of the importance of a certain value (like ‘keeping promises’) and subsequently questions for reasoning or justification for support of the importance of that value.
Test for: Brugman, D., Beerthuizen, M.G.C. J., Helmond, P.E., Basinger, K., & Gibbs, J.C. (2021). Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective. ISSN: 1015-5759. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Volume: 0. eISSN: 2151-2426. 1-11. © 2021Hogrefe Publishing.
Keyword(s)
moral judgment moral development adolescence objective measure validityPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2021-11-12
Language of content
English
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
Brugman, D. (2021). SRM-SFO - Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5206
-
SRM-SFO_DB.pdfAdobe PDF - 142.36KBMD5: e04f9435051b7f7e10f493da25b16964Description: Instrument SRM-SFO
-
Brugman et al. CODEBOOK&INSTRUCTIONAL EXAMPLE SRM-SFO.pdfAdobe PDF - 163.21KBMD5: 122bf04679497797564a1221d15a0b0bDescription: Codebook for calculation mature moral judgment score
-
22023-03-30Correction of an error in question 7c of the codebook; in the fourth column the 0 was changed to 1.
-
12021-11-12
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Brugman, Daniel
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2021-11-12T17:05:54Z
-
Made available on2021-11-12T17:05:54Z
-
Date of first publication2021-11-12
-
Abstract / DescriptionThe Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO) aims to assess the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. A new index for measuring moral reasoning is introduced. The first study assessed construct validity by examining the structure and invariance of moral reasoning and moral value evaluation in community adolescents and adults from The Netherlands (N = 1,583). Factor analyses supported the unidimensionality of both components. Measurement invariance was found across age groups, gender, and educational levels. Convergent validity was supported by positive relationships between moral reasoning and age in males and between moral reasoning and higher educational levels. Divergent validity was supported by the weak relationship of both components with social desirability and their negative relationship with self-centered orientation and self-reported antisocial/delinquent behavior. The second study included incarcerated juvenile delinquents (N = 246). Measurement invariance was found for both components across delinquency groups. Furthermore, community participants reporting no antisocial/delinquent behavior showed higher levels on both components than community participants reporting antisocial/delinquent behavior and juvenile delinquents. The SRM-SFO provides acceptable to good psychometric properties for assessing the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. Its practical benefits support its use in large-scale research from young adolescence onward.The SRM-SFO consists of 10 sets of questions. Each set introduces a value, often in an everyday context (Appendix). The values are organized in four areas: Contract & Truth (item set 1-4), Affiliation (5), Life (6-7), Property, Law, and Legal Justice (8-10). Following the introductory stem is a question regarding the evaluation of the importance of a certain value (like ‘keeping promises’) and subsequently questions for reasoning or justification for support of the importance of that value.en
-
Abstract / DescriptionTest for: Brugman, D., Beerthuizen, M.G.C. J., Helmond, P.E., Basinger, K., & Gibbs, J.C. (2021). Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective. ISSN: 1015-5759. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Volume: 0. eISSN: 2151-2426. 1-11. © 2021Hogrefe Publishing.en
-
Publication statusunknownen
-
Review statusunknownen
-
CitationBrugman, D. (2021). SRM-SFO - Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objective. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5206en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4621
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5206
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Is referenced byhttps://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000680
-
Is related tohttps://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/4620
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000680
-
Keyword(s)moral judgmenten
-
Keyword(s)moral developmenten
-
Keyword(s)adolescenceen
-
Keyword(s)objective measureen
-
Keyword(s)validityen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleTest for: Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure - Short Form Objectiveen
-
DRO typetesten
-
Leibniz subject classificationSozialwissenschaftende_DE
-
Visible tag(s)Hogrefe