Preregistration

Item-context binding in language switching

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Benini, Elena

Abstract / Description

Language-switching paradigms, in general, have been used to investigate language control (Meuter & Allport, 1999; see Declerck & Philipp, 2015 for a review on language switching and language control processes). In a given trial, using the same language as in the previous trial implies worse performance than repeating it. Previous experiments (Benini et al., in prep) found that such language repetition benefits can be modulated by switching versus repeating an irrelevant feature (the context henceforth). Specifically, when an irrelevant feature repeats from the previous trial, re-using the language yields larger benefits than when the context switches. In other words, language transition (repetition vs. switch) interacted with context transition. This is consistent with the idea that the context might be bound with the language and retrieve it in the following trial, improving performance when the language needs indeed to be repeated. In the present experiment, we want to measure whether the target can also be bound with the language and the context after only one presentation.

Keyword(s)

binding language retrieval context features bilinguals switching

Persistent Identifier

PsychArchives acquisition timestamp

2023-02-20 18:30:41 UTC

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Benini, Elena
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-02-20T18:30:41Z
  • Made available on
    2023-02-20T18:30:41Z
  • Date of first publication
    2023-02-20
  • Abstract / Description
    Language-switching paradigms, in general, have been used to investigate language control (Meuter & Allport, 1999; see Declerck & Philipp, 2015 for a review on language switching and language control processes). In a given trial, using the same language as in the previous trial implies worse performance than repeating it. Previous experiments (Benini et al., in prep) found that such language repetition benefits can be modulated by switching versus repeating an irrelevant feature (the context henceforth). Specifically, when an irrelevant feature repeats from the previous trial, re-using the language yields larger benefits than when the context switches. In other words, language transition (repetition vs. switch) interacted with context transition. This is consistent with the idea that the context might be bound with the language and retrieve it in the following trial, improving performance when the language needs indeed to be repeated. In the present experiment, we want to measure whether the target can also be bound with the language and the context after only one presentation.
    en
  • Publication status
    other
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8076
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12539
  • Language of content
    eng
    en
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    binding
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    language
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    retrieval
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    context features
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    bilinguals
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    switching
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Item-context binding in language switching
    en
  • DRO type
    preregistration
    en
  • Visible tag(s)
    PRP-QUANT
    en