Item-context binding in language switching
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Benini, Elena
Abstract / Description
Language-switching paradigms, in general, have been used to investigate language control (Meuter & Allport, 1999; see Declerck & Philipp, 2015 for a review on language switching and language control processes). In a given trial, using the same language as in the previous trial implies worse performance than repeating it. Previous experiments (Benini et al., in prep) found that such language repetition benefits can be modulated by switching versus repeating an irrelevant feature (the context henceforth). Specifically, when an irrelevant feature repeats from the previous trial, re-using the language yields larger benefits than when the context switches. In other words, language transition (repetition vs. switch) interacted with context transition. This is consistent with the idea that the context might be bound with the language and retrieve it in the following trial, improving performance when the language needs indeed to be repeated.
In the present experiment, we want to measure whether the target can also be bound with the language and the context after only one presentation.
Keyword(s)
binding language retrieval context features bilinguals switchingPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2023-02-20 18:30:41 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
ICB_preregistration.pdfAdobe PDF - 456.21KBMD5: 7150a06a031e5a618f7ec2702e9c2189Description: pdf of the preregistration
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Benini, Elena
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2023-02-20T18:30:41Z
-
Made available on2023-02-20T18:30:41Z
-
Date of first publication2023-02-20
-
Abstract / DescriptionLanguage-switching paradigms, in general, have been used to investigate language control (Meuter & Allport, 1999; see Declerck & Philipp, 2015 for a review on language switching and language control processes). In a given trial, using the same language as in the previous trial implies worse performance than repeating it. Previous experiments (Benini et al., in prep) found that such language repetition benefits can be modulated by switching versus repeating an irrelevant feature (the context henceforth). Specifically, when an irrelevant feature repeats from the previous trial, re-using the language yields larger benefits than when the context switches. In other words, language transition (repetition vs. switch) interacted with context transition. This is consistent with the idea that the context might be bound with the language and retrieve it in the following trial, improving performance when the language needs indeed to be repeated. In the present experiment, we want to measure whether the target can also be bound with the language and the context after only one presentation.en
-
Publication statusotheren
-
Review statusunknownen
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8076en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12539
-
Language of contentengen
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen
-
Keyword(s)bindingen
-
Keyword(s)languageen
-
Keyword(s)retrievalen
-
Keyword(s)context featuresen
-
Keyword(s)bilingualsen
-
Keyword(s)switchingen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleItem-context binding in language switchingen
-
DRO typepreregistrationen
-
Visible tag(s)PRP-QUANTen