Development and psychometric evaluation of the Hope in Medicine scale
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Balthasar, Lea
Bräscher, Anne-Kathrin
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
Ballou, Sarah K.
Kube, Tobias
Abstract / Description
Background: Hope is an integral, multi-dimensional part of seeking medical treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a self-report scale, the Hope in Medicine (HIM) scale, to measure different modes of hoping in relation to the course of symptoms, the effects of treatment, and supporting medical research. Method: We examined the psychometric properties of the scale in a sample of 74 allergic rhinitis patients participating in a 2-week randomized-controlled trial comparing open-label placebos (OLP) with treatment as usual (TAU). Results: The HIM scale had a Cronbach’s α of .78. An exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors: realistic hope (i.e., hoping for specific positive outcomes such as improvement in symptoms), transcendent hope (i.e., non-directed hoping that things will turn out positively), utopian hope (i.e., hoping to contribute to greater knowledge), and technoscience hope (i.e., hoping for scientific breakthroughs). Speaking to the convergent validity of the scale, realistic hope was moderately related to treatment expectancies (r = .54); transcendent hope was related to optimism (r = .50), treatment expectancies (r = .37), self-efficacy (r = .36), and inversely correlated with pessimism (r = -.43). Hope subscales predicted neither course of symptoms nor impairment. Conclusion: The HIM scale is a questionnaire with adequate internal consistency allowing to assess four modes of hoping. Preliminary results for its convergent validity are promising. Yet, further validation is needed.
Keyword(s)
hope placebo questionnaire self-report allergic rhinitisPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2024-03-28
Journal title
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Volume
6
Issue
1
Article number
Article e12001
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Balthasar, L., Bräscher, A., Kaptchuk, T. J., Ballou, S. K., & Kube, T. (2024). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Hope in Medicine scale. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(1), Article e12001. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12001
-
cpe.v6i1.12001.pdfAdobe PDF - 456.96KBMD5: 3b3b0f32cb973881f2b2532549f7b1dc
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Balthasar, Lea
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bräscher, Anne-Kathrin
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kaptchuk, Ted J.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Ballou, Sarah K.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kube, Tobias
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2024-08-21T10:16:53Z
-
Made available on2024-08-21T10:16:53Z
-
Date of first publication2024-03-28
-
Abstract / DescriptionBackground: Hope is an integral, multi-dimensional part of seeking medical treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a self-report scale, the Hope in Medicine (HIM) scale, to measure different modes of hoping in relation to the course of symptoms, the effects of treatment, and supporting medical research. Method: We examined the psychometric properties of the scale in a sample of 74 allergic rhinitis patients participating in a 2-week randomized-controlled trial comparing open-label placebos (OLP) with treatment as usual (TAU). Results: The HIM scale had a Cronbach’s α of .78. An exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors: realistic hope (i.e., hoping for specific positive outcomes such as improvement in symptoms), transcendent hope (i.e., non-directed hoping that things will turn out positively), utopian hope (i.e., hoping to contribute to greater knowledge), and technoscience hope (i.e., hoping for scientific breakthroughs). Speaking to the convergent validity of the scale, realistic hope was moderately related to treatment expectancies (r = .54); transcendent hope was related to optimism (r = .50), treatment expectancies (r = .37), self-efficacy (r = .36), and inversely correlated with pessimism (r = -.43). Hope subscales predicted neither course of symptoms nor impairment. Conclusion: The HIM scale is a questionnaire with adequate internal consistency allowing to assess four modes of hoping. Preliminary results for its convergent validity are promising. Yet, further validation is needed.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationBalthasar, L., Bräscher, A., Kaptchuk, T. J., Ballou, S. K., & Kube, T. (2024). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Hope in Medicine scale. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(1), Article e12001. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12001en_US
-
ISSN2625-3410
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/10704
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15275
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12001
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14058
-
Is related tohttps://aspredicted.org/ss6ag.pdf
-
Keyword(s)hopeen_US
-
Keyword(s)placeboen_US
-
Keyword(s)questionnaireen_US
-
Keyword(s)self-reporten_US
-
Keyword(s)allergic rhinitisen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDevelopment and psychometric evaluation of the Hope in Medicine scaleen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Article numberArticle e12001
-
Issue1
-
Journal titleClinical Psychology in Europe
-
Volume6
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Recorden_US