Code

Code for: Therapists’ prototypes of common mental disorders – an empirical identification

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Kröber, Svea
Bonnin, Gabriel
Schneider, Silvia
Merz, Raphael
Hirschfeld, Gerrit
Hötzel, Katrin
Lewer, Merle
von Brachel, Ruth

Abstract / Description

This is the online supplement to a study to identify therapists' prototypes of four common mental disorders. Although earlier studies concluded that clinicians’ prototypes of patients with mental disorders can influence diagnostic decisions, it remains unclear how presumably more or less prototypical features were identified in these studies in the first place. As research on the content of therapists’ prototypes of mental disorders is very limited, the aim of the current study was to identify therapists’ prototypes of major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. Psychotherapists (N=69) filled out an online survey and answered questions on the most common thoughts, feelings, behaviors, appearance, life circumstances, age, and gender of a person with each disorder. Additionally, they rated the DSM-5 criteria according to how much they think about each criterion when thinking about a typical person with the respective disorder. The most frequently mentioned features of a typical person with each disorder are reported and positive and negative associations between features are visualized by means of network analyses . Besides some exceptions, therapists’ responses were mostly in line with the DSM-5 criteria and with frequencies of symptoms in patients with each disorder. Therapists’ prototypes might be helpful to make diagnostic decisions in typical situations but could lead to incorrectly diagnosing or overlooking a disorder in less typical situations. The results of the current study should be used to increase therapists’ awareness of prototypes and to emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis, e.g. with structured interviews. Further research should investigate the influence of the prototypical features identified in the current study on therapists’ diagnostic decisions.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2023-03-31

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Kröber, Svea
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Bonnin, Gabriel
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schneider, Silvia
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Merz, Raphael
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hirschfeld, Gerrit
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hötzel, Katrin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Lewer, Merle
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    von Brachel, Ruth
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-03-31T10:56:40Z
  • Made available on
    2023-03-31T10:56:40Z
  • Date of first publication
    2023-03-31
  • Abstract / Description
    This is the online supplement to a study to identify therapists' prototypes of four common mental disorders. Although earlier studies concluded that clinicians’ prototypes of patients with mental disorders can influence diagnostic decisions, it remains unclear how presumably more or less prototypical features were identified in these studies in the first place. As research on the content of therapists’ prototypes of mental disorders is very limited, the aim of the current study was to identify therapists’ prototypes of major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. Psychotherapists (N=69) filled out an online survey and answered questions on the most common thoughts, feelings, behaviors, appearance, life circumstances, age, and gender of a person with each disorder. Additionally, they rated the DSM-5 criteria according to how much they think about each criterion when thinking about a typical person with the respective disorder. The most frequently mentioned features of a typical person with each disorder are reported and positive and negative associations between features are visualized by means of network analyses . Besides some exceptions, therapists’ responses were mostly in line with the DSM-5 criteria and with frequencies of symptoms in patients with each disorder. Therapists’ prototypes might be helpful to make diagnostic decisions in typical situations but could lead to incorrectly diagnosing or overlooking a disorder in less typical situations. The results of the current study should be used to increase therapists’ awareness of prototypes and to emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis, e.g. with structured interviews. Further research should investigate the influence of the prototypical features identified in the current study on therapists’ diagnostic decisions.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8182
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12654
  • Language of content
    eng
    en
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/8181
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Code for: Therapists’ prototypes of common mental disorders – an empirical identification
    en
  • DRO type
    code
    en