Article Version of Record

Causality of the satisfaction–performance relationship: A task experiment

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Dudasova, Ludmila
Vaculik, Martin
Prochazka, Jakub
Svitavska, Petra
Patton, Gregory

Abstract / Description

Despite the common belief among practitioners that a happy worker is a productive worker, researchers have been struggling to understand the causality between satisfaction and performance for decades. This study attempts to bring clarity to current understanding through an experiment with repeated measures of satisfaction and performance. A total of 143 participants repeatedly performed a task based on the Stroop test, with their objective performance and task satisfaction measured each time. Two different types of feedback (high/low performance) were randomly assigned to participants in order to manipulate perceived performance. The data were analyzed using a path analysis. The results support the hypothesized influence of task satisfaction on task performance and of perceived task performance on task satisfaction.

Keyword(s)

satisfaction performance autonomy need for autonomy feedback

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2023-02-28

Journal title

Europe's Journal of Psychology

Volume

19

Issue

1

Page numbers

48–66

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Dudasova, L., Vaculik, M., Prochazka, J., Svitavska, P., & Patton, G. (2023). Causality of the satisfaction–performance relationship: A task experiment. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4075
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Dudasova, Ludmila
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Vaculik, Martin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Prochazka, Jakub
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Svitavska, Petra
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Patton, Gregory
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-04-28T10:04:22Z
  • Made available on
    2023-04-28T10:04:22Z
  • Date of first publication
    2023-02-28
  • Abstract / Description
    Despite the common belief among practitioners that a happy worker is a productive worker, researchers have been struggling to understand the causality between satisfaction and performance for decades. This study attempts to bring clarity to current understanding through an experiment with repeated measures of satisfaction and performance. A total of 143 participants repeatedly performed a task based on the Stroop test, with their objective performance and task satisfaction measured each time. Two different types of feedback (high/low performance) were randomly assigned to participants in order to manipulate perceived performance. The data were analyzed using a path analysis. The results support the hypothesized influence of task satisfaction on task performance and of perceived task performance on task satisfaction.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Dudasova, L., Vaculik, M., Prochazka, J., Svitavska, P., & Patton, G. (2023). Causality of the satisfaction–performance relationship: A task experiment. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4075
  • ISSN
    1841-0413
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8333
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12810
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4075
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7965
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7965
  • Keyword(s)
    satisfaction
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    performance
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    autonomy
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    need for autonomy
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    feedback
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Causality of the satisfaction–performance relationship: A task experiment
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Europe's Journal of Psychology
  • Page numbers
    48–66
  • Volume
    19
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record
    en_US