Preregistration

Preregistrations for: Pummerer, Fock, Winter, Sassenberg. Conspiracy Beliefs and Majority Influence. The Journal of Social Psychology.

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Pummerer, Lotte
Fock, Lukas
Winter, Kevin
Sassenberg, Kai

Abstract / Description

Conspiracy beliefs (i.e., beliefs in specific conspiracy theories or the more general conspiracy mentality) are associated with a need for uniqueness and lower adherence to social norms. These findings suggest that conspiracy beliefs might be generally associated with less influence by majority opinions – absolutely and compared to minority opinions. In five experiments involving scenarios unrelated to conspiracy theories (overall N = 1669), participants were informed about the majority/minority opinion on a given issue (e.g., the building of a tunnel), afterwards indicating their evaluation or voting intentions regarding the issue. We then tested whether the influence of a majority/minority opinion on evaluation or voting intentions is moderated by conspiracy beliefs. Across studies, we find no significant moderation. A meta-analysis confirms no correlation between conspiracy beliefs and susceptibility to majority influence. Taken together, our studies provide no evidence for the assumption that those holding conspiracy beliefs reject majority opinions per se.

Persistent Identifier

PsychArchives acquisition timestamp

2024-08-01 13:50:10 UTC

Publisher

PsychArchives

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Pummerer, Lotte
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Fock, Lukas
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Winter, Kevin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Sassenberg, Kai
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2024-08-01T13:50:10Z
  • Made available on
    2024-08-01T13:50:10Z
  • Date of first publication
    2024-08-01
  • Abstract / Description
    Conspiracy beliefs (i.e., beliefs in specific conspiracy theories or the more general conspiracy mentality) are associated with a need for uniqueness and lower adherence to social norms. These findings suggest that conspiracy beliefs might be generally associated with less influence by majority opinions – absolutely and compared to minority opinions. In five experiments involving scenarios unrelated to conspiracy theories (overall N = 1669), participants were informed about the majority/minority opinion on a given issue (e.g., the building of a tunnel), afterwards indicating their evaluation or voting intentions regarding the issue. We then tested whether the influence of a majority/minority opinion on evaluation or voting intentions is moderated by conspiracy beliefs. Across studies, we find no significant moderation. A meta-analysis confirms no correlation between conspiracy beliefs and susceptibility to majority influence. Taken together, our studies provide no evidence for the assumption that those holding conspiracy beliefs reject majority opinions per se.
    en
  • Publication status
    other
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Sponsorship
    Parts of the reported research have been supported by a grant by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to the last author (DFG: SA800/17-1).
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/10643
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.15211
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is referenced by
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2397491
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10642
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/10641
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Preregistrations for: Pummerer, Fock, Winter, Sassenberg. Conspiracy Beliefs and Majority Influence. The Journal of Social Psychology.
    en
  • DRO type
    preregistration