Can a small stimulus set reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
de Haas, Benjamin
Abstract / Description
This study aims to replicate recent findings of consistent individual differences in fixation tendencies along six semantic dimensions. It will further test whether such individual fixation tendencies can be reliably estimated using a smaller stimulus set than that of the original study (700 images; de Haas et al., 2019). Specifically, it will test the reliability of individual fixation tendencies seen for subsets of 40, 100 or 200 images, as well as their consistency with fixation tendencies seen for the full set of 700 images.
Corresponding article: Linka, M., & de Haas, B. (2020). OSIEshort: A small stimulus set can reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience. Journal of Vision, 20(9), 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.9.13
Keyword(s)
individual differences semantic salience gaze behaviorPersistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2019-06-04 15:53:16 UTC
Citation
De Haas, B. (2019, June 4). Can a small stimulus set reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience? Leibniz Institut für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2454
-
DeHaas_Jun2019.pdfAdobe PDF - 187.71KBMD5: f1d65aa40df6fa9257acdc21fbbab001
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)de Haas, Benjamin
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2019-06-04T15:53:16Z
-
Made available on2019-06-04T15:53:16Z
-
Date of first publication2019-06-04
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis study aims to replicate recent findings of consistent individual differences in fixation tendencies along six semantic dimensions. It will further test whether such individual fixation tendencies can be reliably estimated using a smaller stimulus set than that of the original study (700 images; de Haas et al., 2019). Specifically, it will test the reliability of individual fixation tendencies seen for subsets of 40, 100 or 200 images, as well as their consistency with fixation tendencies seen for the full set of 700 images.en_US
-
Abstract / DescriptionCorresponding article: Linka, M., & de Haas, B. (2020). OSIEshort: A small stimulus set can reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience. Journal of Vision, 20(9), 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.9.13en
-
Publication statusother
-
SponsorshipBdH is supported by a JUST'US fellowship (Justus Liebig University Giessen)en_US
-
CitationDe Haas, B. (2019, June 4). Can a small stimulus set reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience? Leibniz Institut für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2454en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/2080
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2454
-
Language of contentengen_US
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3088
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3084
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3085
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.9.13
-
Keyword(s)individual differencesen_US
-
Keyword(s)semantic salienceen_US
-
Keyword(s)gaze behavioren_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleCan a small stimulus set reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience?en_US
-
DRO typepreregistrationen_US