(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Nachtigall, Christof
Kroehne, Ulf
Funke, Friedrich
Steyer, Rolf
Abstract / Description
During the last two decades, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) has evolved from a statistical technique for insiders to an established valuable tool for a broad scientific public. This class of analyses has much to offer, but at what price? This paper provides an overview on SEM, its underlying ideas, potential applications and current software. Furthermore, it discusses avoidable pitfalls as well as built-in drawbacks in order to lend support to researchers in deciding whether or not SEM should be integrated into their research tools. Commented findings of an internet survey give a “State of the Union Address” on SEM users and usage. Which kinds of models are preferred? Which software is favoured in current psychological research? In order to assist the reader on his first steps, a SEM first-aid kit is included. Typical problems and possible solutions are addressed, helping the reader to get the support he needs. Hence, the paper may assist the novice on the first steps and self-critically reminds the advanced reader of the limitations of Structural Equation Modeling
Keyword(s)
Structural equation modeling (SEM) internet survey SEM software AMOS EQS LISRELPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2003
Journal title
Methods of Psychological Research
Volume
8
Issue
2
Page numbers
1-22
Publisher
Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
unknown
Citation
-
MPR-Online_2003_8.2_Nachtigall_Kroehne_Funke_Steyer.pdfAdobe PDF - 2.61MBMD5: f3bda3b2b9f458a748b9a8226e1280f4
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Nachtigall, Christof
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kroehne, Ulf
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Funke, Friedrich
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Steyer, Rolf
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2023-04-25T14:26:07Z
-
Made available on2023-04-25T14:26:07Z
-
Date of first publication2003
-
Abstract / DescriptionDuring the last two decades, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) has evolved from a statistical technique for insiders to an established valuable tool for a broad scientific public. This class of analyses has much to offer, but at what price? This paper provides an overview on SEM, its underlying ideas, potential applications and current software. Furthermore, it discusses avoidable pitfalls as well as built-in drawbacks in order to lend support to researchers in deciding whether or not SEM should be integrated into their research tools. Commented findings of an internet survey give a “State of the Union Address” on SEM users and usage. Which kinds of models are preferred? Which software is favoured in current psychological research? In order to assist the reader on his first steps, a SEM first-aid kit is included. Typical problems and possible solutions are addressed, helping the reader to get the support he needs. Hence, the paper may assist the novice on the first steps and self-critically reminds the advanced reader of the limitations of Structural Equation Modelingen
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statusunknown
-
ISSN1432-8534
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8306
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12783
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherDepartment of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
-
Keyword(s)Structural equation modeling (SEM)en_US
-
Keyword(s)internet surveyen_US
-
Keyword(s)SEM softwareen_US
-
Keyword(s)AMOSen_US
-
Keyword(s)EQSen_US
-
Keyword(s)LISRELen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
Title(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modelingen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue2
-
Journal titleMethods of Psychological Research
-
Page numbers1-22
-
Volume8
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record