Article Version of Record

(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Nachtigall, Christof
Kroehne, Ulf
Funke, Friedrich
Steyer, Rolf

Abstract / Description

During the last two decades, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) has evolved from a statistical technique for insiders to an established valuable tool for a broad scientific public. This class of analyses has much to offer, but at what price? This paper provides an overview on SEM, its underlying ideas, potential applications and current software. Furthermore, it discusses avoidable pitfalls as well as built-in drawbacks in order to lend support to researchers in deciding whether or not SEM should be integrated into their research tools. Commented findings of an internet survey give a “State of the Union Address” on SEM users and usage. Which kinds of models are preferred? Which software is favoured in current psychological research? In order to assist the reader on his first steps, a SEM first-aid kit is included. Typical problems and possible solutions are addressed, helping the reader to get the support he needs. Hence, the paper may assist the novice on the first steps and self-critically reminds the advanced reader of the limitations of Structural Equation Modeling

Keyword(s)

Structural equation modeling (SEM) internet survey SEM software AMOS EQS LISREL

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2003

Journal title

Methods of Psychological Research

Volume

8

Issue

2

Page numbers

1-22

Publisher

Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

unknown

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Nachtigall, Christof
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Kroehne, Ulf
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Funke, Friedrich
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Steyer, Rolf
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-04-25T14:26:07Z
  • Made available on
    2023-04-25T14:26:07Z
  • Date of first publication
    2003
  • Abstract / Description
    During the last two decades, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) has evolved from a statistical technique for insiders to an established valuable tool for a broad scientific public. This class of analyses has much to offer, but at what price? This paper provides an overview on SEM, its underlying ideas, potential applications and current software. Furthermore, it discusses avoidable pitfalls as well as built-in drawbacks in order to lend support to researchers in deciding whether or not SEM should be integrated into their research tools. Commented findings of an internet survey give a “State of the Union Address” on SEM users and usage. Which kinds of models are preferred? Which software is favoured in current psychological research? In order to assist the reader on his first steps, a SEM first-aid kit is included. Typical problems and possible solutions are addressed, helping the reader to get the support he needs. Hence, the paper may assist the novice on the first steps and self-critically reminds the advanced reader of the limitations of Structural Equation Modeling
    en
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    unknown
  • ISSN
    1432-8534
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8306
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12783
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau
  • Keyword(s)
    Structural equation modeling (SEM)
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    internet survey
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    SEM software
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    AMOS
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    EQS
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    LISREL
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    (Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Methods of Psychological Research
  • Page numbers
    1-22
  • Volume
    8
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record