Dataset for: The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on Stimulus-Response Binding
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Qiu, Ruyi
Abstract / Description
Dataset for: Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., Frings, C., & Mayr, S. (2023). The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus–response binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
A core characteristic of auditory stimuli is that they develop over time. Referring to the event segmentation theory, we assume that the on- and offset of a contextual sound indicates the start and end of an event. As a consequence, stimuli and responses appearing within a common auditory context may be integrated more likely/strongly, forming so-called event files, than those appearing in different auditory contexts. In two experiments, this hypothesis was tested using the negative priming paradigm and the distractor–response binding paradigm. In prime–probe presentations, participants identified target sounds via keypresses while ignoring distractor sounds. Additional sine tones acted as the context in the prime, whereas the probe context was silence. In the common context condition, the context started with the prime sounds and ended with the prime response. In the changing context condition, the context started with the prime sounds but changed to another tone after the offset of the prime sounds. Results from both experiments revealed a larger stimulus–response binding effect in the common than in the changing context condition. We conducted a control experiment to test the alternative account of contextual similarity between the prime and the probe. Together, our results suggest that common context can temporally segment stimuli and responses into event files, providing evidence of common context as a binding principle.
Persistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2022-12-29
Publisher
PsychArchives
Is referenced by
Citation
-
CodeBook.pdfAdobe PDF - 82.51KBMD5 : 042b473094e2bb7860dfe930d049ad8fDescription: Codebook for participants' raw data of online (Experiment 1) and offline (Experiment 2A and 2B) experiments
-
Event segmentation by context_data and preProcessing code.zipUnknown - 1.67MBMD5 : 7671160f0003256b3f93046aacd742ccDescription: Raw data and preprocessing code for Experiment 1, Experiment 2A and Experiment 2B of the study "The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on S-R binding"
-
22022-12-28Corrected raw data "7_29_20_10_09 AM00527" and "7_31_20_10_02 AM01425" of Exp 1. Exchanged the LiveCode script with an R script for data preprocessing of Exp 1. Added more instructions to "readme" files and data preprocessing scripts of all experiments.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Qiu, Ruyi
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-12-29T08:47:05Z
-
Made available on2022-11-23T15:49:57Z
-
Made available on2022-12-29T08:47:05Z
-
Date of first publication2022-12-29
-
Abstract / DescriptionDataset for: Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., Frings, C., & Mayr, S. (2023). The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus–response binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093en_US
-
Abstract / DescriptionA core characteristic of auditory stimuli is that they develop over time. Referring to the event segmentation theory, we assume that the on- and offset of a contextual sound indicates the start and end of an event. As a consequence, stimuli and responses appearing within a common auditory context may be integrated more likely/strongly, forming so-called event files, than those appearing in different auditory contexts. In two experiments, this hypothesis was tested using the negative priming paradigm and the distractor–response binding paradigm. In prime–probe presentations, participants identified target sounds via keypresses while ignoring distractor sounds. Additional sine tones acted as the context in the prime, whereas the probe context was silence. In the common context condition, the context started with the prime sounds and ended with the prime response. In the changing context condition, the context started with the prime sounds but changed to another tone after the offset of the prime sounds. Results from both experiments revealed a larger stimulus–response binding effect in the common than in the changing context condition. We conducted a control experiment to test the alternative account of contextual similarity between the prime and the probe. Together, our results suggest that common context can temporally segment stimuli and responses into event files, providing evidence of common context as a binding principle.en
-
Review statusunknown
-
Table of contentsZIP file contains: Raw data and preprocessing code for Experiment 1, Experiment 2A and Experiment 2Ben
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/7713.2
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12323
-
Language of contentengen_US
-
PublisherPsychArchivesen_US
-
Is referenced byhttps://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
-
Is related tohttps://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDataset for: The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on Stimulus-Response Bindingen_US
-
DRO typeresearchDataen_US