Research Data

Dataset for: The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on Stimulus-Response Binding

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Qiu, Ruyi

Abstract / Description

Dataset for: Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., Frings, C., & Mayr, S. (2023). The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus–response binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
A core characteristic of auditory stimuli is that they develop over time. Referring to the event segmentation theory, we assume that the on- and offset of a contextual sound indicates the start and end of an event. As a consequence, stimuli and responses appearing within a common auditory context may be integrated more likely/strongly, forming so-called event files, than those appearing in different auditory contexts. In two experiments, this hypothesis was tested using the negative priming paradigm and the distractor–response binding paradigm. In prime–probe presentations, participants identified target sounds via keypresses while ignoring distractor sounds. Additional sine tones acted as the context in the prime, whereas the probe context was silence. In the common context condition, the context started with the prime sounds and ended with the prime response. In the changing context condition, the context started with the prime sounds but changed to another tone after the offset of the prime sounds. Results from both experiments revealed a larger stimulus–response binding effect in the common than in the changing context condition. We conducted a control experiment to test the alternative account of contextual similarity between the prime and the probe. Together, our results suggest that common context can temporally segment stimuli and responses into event files, providing evidence of common context as a binding principle.

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2022-12-29

Publisher

PsychArchives

Is referenced by

Citation

  • CodeBook.pdf
    Adobe PDF  - 82.51KB
    MD5 : 042b473094e2bb7860dfe930d049ad8f
     Download
    Description: Codebook for participants' raw data of online (Experiment 1) and offline (Experiment 2A and 2B) experiments
  • Event segmentation by context_data and preProcessing code.zip
    Unknown  - 1.67MB
    MD5 : 7671160f0003256b3f93046aacd742cc
    Description: Raw data and preprocessing code for Experiment 1, Experiment 2A and Experiment 2B of the study "The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on S-R binding"
  • 2
    2022-12-28
    Corrected raw data "7_29_20_10_09 AM00527" and "7_31_20_10_02 AM01425" of Exp 1. Exchanged the LiveCode script with an R script for data preprocessing of Exp 1. Added more instructions to "readme" files and data preprocessing scripts of all experiments.
  • 1
    2022-11-23
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Qiu, Ruyi
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-12-29T08:47:05Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-23T15:49:57Z
  • Made available on
    2022-12-29T08:47:05Z
  • Date of first publication
    2022-12-29
  • Abstract / Description
    Dataset for: Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., Frings, C., & Mayr, S. (2023). The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus–response binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
    en_US
  • Abstract / Description
    A core characteristic of auditory stimuli is that they develop over time. Referring to the event segmentation theory, we assume that the on- and offset of a contextual sound indicates the start and end of an event. As a consequence, stimuli and responses appearing within a common auditory context may be integrated more likely/strongly, forming so-called event files, than those appearing in different auditory contexts. In two experiments, this hypothesis was tested using the negative priming paradigm and the distractor–response binding paradigm. In prime–probe presentations, participants identified target sounds via keypresses while ignoring distractor sounds. Additional sine tones acted as the context in the prime, whereas the probe context was silence. In the common context condition, the context started with the prime sounds and ended with the prime response. In the changing context condition, the context started with the prime sounds but changed to another tone after the offset of the prime sounds. Results from both experiments revealed a larger stimulus–response binding effect in the common than in the changing context condition. We conducted a control experiment to test the alternative account of contextual similarity between the prime and the probe. Together, our results suggest that common context can temporally segment stimuli and responses into event files, providing evidence of common context as a binding principle.
    en
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Table of contents
    ZIP file contains: Raw data and preprocessing code for Experiment 1, Experiment 2A and Experiment 2B
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/7713.2
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12323
  • Language of content
    eng
    en_US
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
    en_US
  • Is referenced by
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001093
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Dataset for: The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on Stimulus-Response Binding
    en_US
  • DRO type
    researchData
    en_US