The Status Quo of FAIR Data Sharing in Psychology
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [What does this mean?].
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Bittermann, André
Loehlein, Anna M.
Omieczynski, Christian
Lauer, Tim
Gollwitzer, Mario
Sassenberg, Kai
Abstract / Description
Data sharing is paramount for reproducible science, yet few studies have examined whether shared data meet FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles, often relying on small journal samples. Hence, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 11,384 psychology datasets (2013–2024) indexed in PsycInfo and PSYNDEX, assessing FAIRness with the F-UJI tool. While data sharing has increased, the FAIRness profile was uneven: datasets were generally findable and interoperable but less accessible and reusable. FAIRness varied mainly by repository, but not substantially by year, subfield, journal, or author characteristics. Higher reusability was linked to increased citation rates. Comparing F-UJI scores with a manual checklist, we highlight that FAIRness is not a univocally measurable construct. In light of this plurality, we provide a brief checklist for editors and reviewers that adds practical guidance beyond F-UJI to support improvements in data FAIRness. Finally, we highlight the value of coordinated efforts by repositories, authors, and journals.
Keyword(s)
open data open science data reuse FAIR assessment data archivingPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2026-09-02
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
-
Bittermann et al. (2026)_FAIR data in psychology_Preprint_v2.pdfAdobe PDF - 3.42MBMD5 : 021033c7ccc94099dad885d06fdb7503
-
22026-09-02We now provide evidence for concurrent validity of F-UJI’s results, as well as additional data to show that the found FAIRness differences between repositories are not due to technical limitations of F-UJI.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Bittermann, André
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Loehlein, Anna M.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Omieczynski, Christian
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Lauer, Tim
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Gollwitzer, Mario
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Sassenberg, Kai
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2026-09-02T08:14:04Z
-
Made available on2025-10-16T07:27:56Z
-
Made available on2026-09-02T08:14:04Z
-
Date of first publication2026-09-02
-
Abstract / DescriptionData sharing is paramount for reproducible science, yet few studies have examined whether shared data meet FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles, often relying on small journal samples. Hence, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 11,384 psychology datasets (2013–2024) indexed in PsycInfo and PSYNDEX, assessing FAIRness with the F-UJI tool. While data sharing has increased, the FAIRness profile was uneven: datasets were generally findable and interoperable but less accessible and reusable. FAIRness varied mainly by repository, but not substantially by year, subfield, journal, or author characteristics. Higher reusability was linked to increased citation rates. Comparing F-UJI scores with a manual checklist, we highlight that FAIRness is not a univocally measurable construct. In light of this plurality, we provide a brief checklist for editors and reviewers that adds practical guidance beyond F-UJI to support improvements in data FAIRness. Finally, we highlight the value of coordinated efforts by repositories, authors, and journals.en
-
Publication statusother
-
Review statusnotReviewed
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/16683.2
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22442
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is related tohttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11110
-
Is related tohttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/17485
-
Keyword(s)open data
-
Keyword(s)open science
-
Keyword(s)data reuse
-
Keyword(s)FAIR assessment
-
Keyword(s)data archiving
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleThe Status Quo of FAIR Data Sharing in Psychologyen
-
DRO typepreprint
-
Leibniz institute name(s) / abbreviation(s)ZPID