Dataset for: What belongs together retrieves together - The role of perceptual grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Schmalbrock, Philip
Kiesel, Andrea
Frings, Christian
Abstract / Description
Data for Article: Schmalbrock, P., Kiesel, A., & Frings, C. (2022). What Belongs Together Retrieves Together–The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval. Journal of Cognition, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217
Nowadays there is consensus that stimulus and response features are partially represented in the same coding format furthering the binding of these features into event files. If some or all features comprised in an event file repeat later, the whole file can be retrieved thereby modulating ongoing performance (leading to so-called stimulus-response binding effects). Stimulus-response binding effects are usually investigated in sequential priming paradigms where it is assumed that binding occurs in the prime and retrieval in the probe. Importantly, binding and retrieval are not exclusive for targets but also apply to distractor stimuli. A previous study showed that distractor-binding effects were affected by perceptual grouping: Binding effects were significantly larger when stimuli were grouped compared to ungrouped stimuli. Recent theorizing suggests that binding and retrieval are two separate processes that can be individually modulated. Against this background, it is not possible to pinpoint the modulating influence of perceptual grouping on either process at this point in time. Therefore, we adapted the previous study design in two experiments to observe the effect of perceptual grouping on both processes in isolation. Results indicate that perceptual grouping did not impact binding but retrieval: Distractor-response retrieval was reduced when target and distractor were presented in separate objects. Our results thus support recent theorizing on the separation of binding and retrieval.
Keyword(s)
S-R binding perceptual grouping gestalt principlesPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2022-01-28
Publisher
PsychArchives
Is referenced by
Citation
-
Data-Experiment1_Analysis.csvCSV - 26.17KBMD5: 3171d1e557a95d0d4e170a0bcf63e006
-
Data-Expeirment2_Analysis.csvCSV - 29.28KBMD5: 19c302c704a741b794a656234cd6fc67
-
Data-Experiment1_Raw.csvCSV - 6.06MBMD5: 51ed550d2441c23cf53ed76eb2925c73
-
Data-Experiment2_Raw.csvCSV - 6.2MBMD5: 1b89cce8a2865dfd299ee90dbc2beaf5
-
Codebook.txtText - 2.36KBMD5: 9e36ffd599b77dcc53523e4211fcca02Description: Codebook
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Schmalbrock, Philip
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kiesel, Andrea
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Frings, Christian
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-01-28T10:44:46Z
-
Made available on2022-01-28T10:44:46Z
-
Date of first publication2022-01-28
-
Abstract / DescriptionData for Article: Schmalbrock, P., Kiesel, A., & Frings, C. (2022). What Belongs Together Retrieves Together–The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval. Journal of Cognition, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217en
-
Abstract / DescriptionNowadays there is consensus that stimulus and response features are partially represented in the same coding format furthering the binding of these features into event files. If some or all features comprised in an event file repeat later, the whole file can be retrieved thereby modulating ongoing performance (leading to so-called stimulus-response binding effects). Stimulus-response binding effects are usually investigated in sequential priming paradigms where it is assumed that binding occurs in the prime and retrieval in the probe. Importantly, binding and retrieval are not exclusive for targets but also apply to distractor stimuli. A previous study showed that distractor-binding effects were affected by perceptual grouping: Binding effects were significantly larger when stimuli were grouped compared to ungrouped stimuli. Recent theorizing suggests that binding and retrieval are two separate processes that can be individually modulated. Against this background, it is not possible to pinpoint the modulating influence of perceptual grouping on either process at this point in time. Therefore, we adapted the previous study design in two experiments to observe the effect of perceptual grouping on both processes in isolation. Results indicate that perceptual grouping did not impact binding but retrieval: Distractor-response retrieval was reduced when target and distractor were presented in separate objects. Our results thus support recent theorizing on the separation of binding and retrieval.en
-
Review statusunknown
-
SponsorshipThe research reported in this article was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FR2133/14-1).en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4771
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5364
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Is referenced byhttp://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217
-
Is related tohttp://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217
-
Keyword(s)S-R bindingen
-
Keyword(s)perceptual groupingen
-
Keyword(s)gestalt principlesen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDataset for: What belongs together retrieves together - The role of perceptual grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrievalen
-
DRO typeresearchData