Conference Object

The Merits of Screening Automation for Bibliometric Analyses: The Case of Translational Psychotherapy

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Petrule, Claudiu
Bittermann, André
Ritter, Viktoria
Haberkamp, Anke
Rief, Winfried

Abstract / Description

Analyzing emerging fields using traditional bibliometric techniques can be difficult due to inconsistent terminology and vague or porous boundaries. The absence of precise terms for database search queries can hinder efforts to fully cover a given construct of interest and may result in biased or distorted representations. The common solution of widening the scope of the search can lead to the inclusion of a large number of false positives, making it difficult to distinguish eligible data from noise. As a consequence, the drastically increased amount of records makes screening an absolute requirement for building a complete and accurate dataset.

Keyword(s)

machine learning metascience methods and techniques screening automation translational research

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2023-07-17

Is part of

Big Data & Research Syntheses 2023, Frankfurt, Germany

Publisher

ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology)

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Petrule, Claudiu
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Bittermann, André
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Ritter, Viktoria
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Haberkamp, Anke
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Rief, Winfried
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2023-07-17T14:14:18Z
  • Made available on
    2023-07-17T14:14:18Z
  • Date of first publication
    2023-07-17
  • Abstract / Description
    Analyzing emerging fields using traditional bibliometric techniques can be difficult due to inconsistent terminology and vague or porous boundaries. The absence of precise terms for database search queries can hinder efforts to fully cover a given construct of interest and may result in biased or distorted representations. The common solution of widening the scope of the search can lead to the inclusion of a large number of false positives, making it difficult to distinguish eligible data from noise. As a consequence, the drastically increased amount of records makes screening an absolute requirement for building a complete and accurate dataset.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/8505
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.13006
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology)
  • Is part of
    Big Data & Research Syntheses 2023, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Is related to
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12961
  • Is related to
    https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/8764
  • Keyword(s)
    machine learning
  • Keyword(s)
    metascience
  • Keyword(s)
    methods and techniques
  • Keyword(s)
    screening automation
  • Keyword(s)
    translational research
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    The Merits of Screening Automation for Bibliometric Analyses: The Case of Translational Psychotherapy
    en
  • DRO type
    conferenceObject
  • Leibniz institute name(s) / abbreviation(s)
    ZPID
  • Visible tag(s)
    ZPID Conferences and Workshops