Article Version of Record

Physical Aggression and Facial Expression Identification

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Taylor, Alisdair James Gordon
Jose, Maria

Abstract / Description

Social information processing theories suggest that aggressive individuals may exhibit hostile perceptual biases when interpreting other’s behaviour. This hypothesis was tested in the present study which investigated the effects of physical aggression on facial expression identification in a sample of healthy participants. Participants were asked to judge the expressions of faces presented to them and to complete a self-report measure of aggression. Relative to low physically aggressive participants, high physically aggressive participants were more likely to mistake non-angry facial expressions as being angry facial expressions (misattribution errors), supporting the idea of a hostile predisposition. These differences were not explained by gender, or response times. There were no differences in identifying angry expressions in general between aggression groups (misperceived errors). These findings add support to the idea that aggressive individuals exhibit hostile perceptual biases when interpreting facial expressions.

Keyword(s)

facial expressions aggression physical face processing emotion

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2014-11-28

Journal title

Europe's Journal of Psychology

Volume

10

Issue

4

Page numbers

650–659

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Taylor, A. J. G., & Jose, M. (2014). Physical Aggression and Facial Expression Identification. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i4.816
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Taylor, Alisdair James Gordon
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Jose, Maria
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T09:59:17Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T09:59:17Z
  • Date of first publication
    2014-11-28
  • Abstract / Description
    Social information processing theories suggest that aggressive individuals may exhibit hostile perceptual biases when interpreting other’s behaviour. This hypothesis was tested in the present study which investigated the effects of physical aggression on facial expression identification in a sample of healthy participants. Participants were asked to judge the expressions of faces presented to them and to complete a self-report measure of aggression. Relative to low physically aggressive participants, high physically aggressive participants were more likely to mistake non-angry facial expressions as being angry facial expressions (misattribution errors), supporting the idea of a hostile predisposition. These differences were not explained by gender, or response times. There were no differences in identifying angry expressions in general between aggression groups (misperceived errors). These findings add support to the idea that aggressive individuals exhibit hostile perceptual biases when interpreting facial expressions.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Taylor, A. J. G., & Jose, M. (2014). Physical Aggression and Facial Expression Identification. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i4.816
  • ISSN
    1841-0413
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/925
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1117
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i4.816
  • Keyword(s)
    facial expressions
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    aggression
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    physical
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    face processing
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    emotion
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Physical Aggression and Facial Expression Identification
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    4
  • Journal title
    Europe's Journal of Psychology
  • Page numbers
    650–659
  • Volume
    10
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record