Negativity Bias, Conformity Bias and Vaccination Hesitancy
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Eyerund, Theresa
Kary, Johanna
Other kind(s) of contributor
Cologne Institute for Economic Research
Abstract / Description
Given the public discussion on measures to increase vaccination rates against the Corona virus in Germany and the increasing social conflicts between pro-vaccine parties and anti-vaccine parties, we want to conduct a brief analysis on the reasons of vaccination hesitancy. The aim of the study is to define the seize of each hesitancy-type group (i.e., calculation, convenience, confidence, complacency) and possible correlations with an individuals’ negativity bias and conformity bias. The main hypothesis behind that is, that the initial attitude towards vaccines in general hugely impacts an individuals’ decision for or against the coronavirus vaccine, amplified through the conformity and negativity biases. The potential negative spiral between initial attitude, conformity and negativity bias might further decrease vaccination willingness. This impact might be evident in varying degree within the different hesitancy-type groups. Along with this, arguments for or against the implementation of certain measures (i.e., which kind of vaccine-hesitancy type can be reached by which measure) should be discussed. An overall aim is to contribute to a public understanding of different vaccination-decision types and a constructive political debate about measures to promote health-enhancing habits.
Persistent Identifier
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
2021-09-06 15:06:27 UTC
Publisher
PsychArchives
Citation
Eyerund, T., & Kary, J. (2021). Negativity Bias, Conformity Bias and Vaccination Hesitancy. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5088
-
Data request_COSMO.pdfAdobe PDF - 96.94KBMD5: 46c4731b049c5b207c385e53ad77b052Description: draft study protocol preregistration
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Eyerund, Theresa
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kary, Johanna
-
Other kind(s) of contributorCologne Institute for Economic Researchen
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2021-09-06T15:06:27Z
-
Made available on2021-09-06T15:06:27Z
-
Date of first publication2021-09-06
-
Abstract / DescriptionGiven the public discussion on measures to increase vaccination rates against the Corona virus in Germany and the increasing social conflicts between pro-vaccine parties and anti-vaccine parties, we want to conduct a brief analysis on the reasons of vaccination hesitancy. The aim of the study is to define the seize of each hesitancy-type group (i.e., calculation, convenience, confidence, complacency) and possible correlations with an individuals’ negativity bias and conformity bias. The main hypothesis behind that is, that the initial attitude towards vaccines in general hugely impacts an individuals’ decision for or against the coronavirus vaccine, amplified through the conformity and negativity biases. The potential negative spiral between initial attitude, conformity and negativity bias might further decrease vaccination willingness. This impact might be evident in varying degree within the different hesitancy-type groups. Along with this, arguments for or against the implementation of certain measures (i.e., which kind of vaccine-hesitancy type can be reached by which measure) should be discussed. An overall aim is to contribute to a public understanding of different vaccination-decision types and a constructive political debate about measures to promote health-enhancing habits.en
-
Publication statusotheren
-
Review statusunknownen
-
CitationEyerund, T., & Kary, J. (2021). Negativity Bias, Conformity Bias and Vaccination Hesitancy. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5088en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4512
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5088
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychArchives
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleNegativity Bias, Conformity Bias and Vaccination Hesitancyen
-
DRO typepreregistrationen